Does anyone else factor in a user's review curve when deciding whether or not to follow them on Letterboxd or am I just being weird

My pet theory is, across eras and genres, movie quality follows standard normal distribution, which is just a fancy and unnecessarily oblique way of saying "most movies are okay"

the peak of my Letterboxd is at 4 because I don't watch shitty movies 😎

if your Letterboxd rating curve is just a wall from 0.5 to 3.5, falls off a cliff at 4, and lands in the ocean at 4.5, what are we even doing here


no I will not read your unedited 2,000-word screed on The Master, and I love The Master

Sign in to participate in the conversation

Welcome to, a movie-flavoured instance home to friendly video store chitchat and general bonhomie.