this is needlessly complicated but very interesting
@derek how could you possibly rate to 100 holy shit
@Thomas It makes my brain cramp up
@derek How does he score it? What's the difference between an 89 and a 90???
@Thomas one point, apparently
@derek lmao
@derek 1 bonus point for uuuuhhh... clearly written credits
@Thomas it's madness
@tessaracked @Thomas I'm gonna have a fucking aneurysm
@derek @tessaracked -1, took the lord's name in vain
@derek @tessaracked -1, saw this once as a kid
@douglasfur @Thomas I see this on Letterboxd, like "Acting: 20/25, Aesthetics: 17/25 [...]" and I stroke out every time
@derek @douglasfur HOW is just shaking me
@Thomas @derek @douglasfur Electronic Gaming Monthly enters the world of cinema
@alex @derek @douglasfur I think even rating parts of a movie separate from others because film is collaborative. How can you rate acting separate from direction? How can you rate cinematography separate from set design or even wardrobe?
@Thomas @derek @douglasfur simple.
you just listen to the score and assign that a number
you then listen to the movie with the screen off and assign that a number
you then watch the movie with no sound and put a thumb up to the screen whenever an actor is present and assign that a score
then you watch the movie through a peephole and only look at the actors' faces and assign th
@alex @Thomas @derek @douglasfur robert parker's leonard maltin's movie guide
@derek @douglasfur @Thomas i love that they think acting and aesthetics make up for a total of 50% of a movies worth. Like you can determine that a movies aesthetic can only ever be worth up to 25%, but something like real world impact isn't even counted
@derek this is too much nuance!
also pick better colours bro, my colourblind ass can't differentiate a bunch of this