inspired by Thomas's newfound disregard of nuance, I will henceforth only review movies using traffic light colours

Mad Max: Fury Road 🟢
Apple in the River 🟡
Trancers 🟢
Antonio Gaudí 🟡
Tokyo Drifter 🟢

critic/filmmaker Dan Sallitt has a baroque six-colour scale he uses instead of ratings place movies in an all-time context

the colors are red (pantheon), orange (near-masterpiece), yellow (Hall of Very Good), blue (good), purple (lowest rung of recommendability or interest), and everything not worth ranking is grey

this is needlessly complicated but very interesting

also pick better colours bro, my colourblind ass can't differentiate a bunch of this

for all it's flaws this is better than Mike D'Angelo's 100-point scale

@Thomas @derek i have a friend who has very complicated metrics for their own personal 100 point scale

@douglasfur @Thomas I see this on Letterboxd, like "Acting: 20/25, Aesthetics: 17/25 [...]" and I stroke out every time

@Thomas @derek @douglasfur Electronic Gaming Monthly enters the world of cinema


@alex @derek @douglasfur I think even rating parts of a movie separate from others because film is collaborative. How can you rate acting separate from direction? How can you rate cinematography separate from set design or even wardrobe?

@Thomas @derek @douglasfur simple.

you just listen to the score and assign that a number
you then listen to the movie with the screen off and assign that a number
you then watch the movie with no sound and put a thumb up to the screen whenever an actor is present and assign that a score
then you watch the movie through a peephole and only look at the actors' faces and assign th

Sign in to participate in the conversation

Welcome to, a movie-flavoured instance home to friendly video store chitchat and general bonhomie.